Needed on July 4: μετανοία

By Ray McGovern, July 4, 2021

Metanoia (from the Greek μετανοία) means turning your mind (νους meaning “mind”) upside down, (μετα adding force, conveying “undo, unfasten, unravel”.) No less than this is required at this liminal moment.

Flawed as they were (like the rest of us) Thomas Jefferson and the other founders of our country did a radical thing 245 years ago. That small group of mostly wealthy men adopted the Declaration of Independence, declaring: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

So the United States of America was founded on the then-radical idea that all men are created equal. True, practice (and even the document itself) did not go far enough, but it was a liminal moment (the Latin “limen” meaning threshold). They summoned the courage to step over a high threshold that had been nailed down for millennia.

We are now at a new liminal moment. The question is will we summon the courage to step over today’s even higher threshold. Progress toward a more equal — a more just — world has been stopped in its tracks by the new, less reputable, more greedy, and wealthier people who have come to power in recent decades. The distortions in their vision are far worse than the defects of those who risked all — as they put it, their “lives, fortunes, and sacred honor” — in declaring independence 245 years ago.

Are We ‘Winter Soldiers’?

Thomas Paine: “These are the times that try men’s souls; the summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”

And here, two centuries later, is Howard Zinn, warning us not to despair: “To engage in whatever nonviolent actions appeal to us: There is no act too small, no act too bold. The history of social change is the history of millions of actions, small and large, coming together at critical [liminal] points to create a power that governments cannot suppress. We find ourselves today at one of those critical points.” 

μετανοία in Context

Franciscan Richard Rohr of the Center for Action and Contemplation today puts metanoia in biblical context in his Daily Meditation:

The great themes of the New Testament continue those of the Hebrew Bible, and one of those “great themes” is the Gospel itself. In ancient times, a “gospel” was a sharing of good news. Why did the Gospel writers choose to use the Greek word euangelion, which means “good news”? I think it’s because the story of Jesus was the news that transformed their lives. It was Good News of unconditional love, that we are loved, and that our entire lives can and should be based on the absolute love of God.

That centers and grounds everything. What a tragedy that so much of Christianity has been made bad news, and has joined with the bad news of Empire, scapegoating, racism, war, sexism, and destruction of the planet. How far we must be from the experience of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John!

Matthew wants to show that Jesus has come to proclaim and to establish “the kingdom of God.” Jesus says, “Turn around! The kingdom of heaven is near” (Matthew 4:17). The realm of God is right here, right now, in the present tense. The relationship with God’s love that sets us free is in our midst. We have to have the humility and trust to turn around and see it.

Here’s how Brian McLaren describes it:

Jesus forms a movement of people who trust him and believe his message. They believe that they don’t have to wait for this or that to happen, but rather that they can begin living in a new and better way now, a way of life Jesus conveys by the pregnant phrase kingdom of God. Life for them now is about an interactive relationship—reconciled to God, reconciled to one another—and so they see their entire lives as an opportunity to make the beautiful music of God’s kingdom so that more and more people will be drawn into it, and so that the world will be changed by their growing influence. It is a much greater message than just individual salvation, which has not gotten us very far at all.

Jesus preaches to “turn around,” or in Greek metanoia, which literally means to “change your mind.” It does not mean self-flagellation or being really down about ourselves, which is what the word “repent” has implied for most of us. It always involves an attitude of trust, letting go, and surrender. Originating with the Hebrew prophets, the biblical idea of metanoia is that of a change of mind and heart, a full turning around, a whole new transformation of one’s mentality and level of consciousness, more than “going to church” or following a new moral code. The message to love is simple. We complicate it.

Rohr ends with this prayer:

Loving God, you fill all things with a fullness and hope that we can never comprehend. Thank you for leading us into a time where more of reality is being unveiled for us all to see. We pray that you will take away our natural temptation for cynicism, denial, fear and despair. Help us have the courage to awaken to greater truth, greater humility, and greater care for one another. May we place our hope in what matters and what lasts, trusting in your eternal presence and love. Listen to our hearts’ longings for the healing of our suffering world. Please add your own intentions . . . Knowing, good God, you are hearing us better than we are speaking, we offer these prayers in all the holy names of God. Amen.

Happy Birthday, Julian

Singing Happy 50th Birthday today for Julian Assange under the non-window of his cell. Grassroots activists are now before Belmarsh prison where my 8-min recording is being played at demo organized by Committee to Defend Julian Assange. 

The Legacy of Donald Rumsfeld

Ray and Scott Ritter on Critical Hour; July 2, 2021


Ray McGovern
, former CIA analyst and co-founder of Veteran Intelligence; joins Scott Ritter, former UN weapon inspector in Iraq; to discuss the Donald Rumsfeld legacy and his actions related to the Iraq invasion. 

From JFK to Biden/Khrushchev to Putin

By Ray McGovern (an interview)

“Crikey, this is it folks.” This is how my Scottish interviewer/podcaster Matthew Howland described a long conversation we had on June 25, covering pretty much the waterfront.

I quickly confirmed that “crikey” does not mean BS; then I listened to parts of the interview and was glad I gave the time to this well informed young interviewer. This is how Howland listed most of the topics we covered:

— Ray’s start at the CIA (1963)
— JFK and Allan Dulles
— Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam
— Retirement as USSR fell apart
— 9/11
— The MICIMATT
— Donald Rumsfeld
— Julian Assange
— Hillary Clinton
— The 2016 election, Russia-gate
— Ukraine
— Russia-China relations
— Trump
— Putin
— Biden-Putin Geneva summit

The Scotts may say “crikey”: My Irish cousins might say “not too bad”.

Whom the Gods Would Destroy: War With Russia and China is Worse Than MAD!

Report on a Panel Discussion, June 26, 2021
By Ray McGovern
Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHacLTeb9r4

This morning I took part in a freewheeling, relaxed discussion addressing some of today’s most important foreign policy issues. It was the kind of conversation-cum-substantive-Q&A that, sadly, one does not easily find in corporate media.

The session began after Mozart’s Laudate Dominum was performed by the Schiller Institute Chamber Singers. Dennis Speed acted as moderator, put initial context around the discussion, and introduced the panelists, who spoke in this order:

1 — Dennis Speed, The Schiller Institute(minutes 6:20 to 12:20)

2 — Helga Zepp-LaRouche, President of the Institute: Keynote (min. 12:20 to 58:00)

3 — Dr. Andrey Kortunov (Russia), Director General, Russian International Affairs Council: “Has the Geneva Summit Changed Relations Between the U.S. and Russia?” (58:55 to 1:14:00)

4 — Atul Aneja (India), Editor, India Narrative.com: “Engaging Russia and China as Part of a New World Order-What Can India Bring to the Table?” (1:14:00 to 1:26:28)

5 — Col. Richard H. Black (ret.), former State Senator (Virginia), former head of the U.S. Army’s Criminal Law Division, “U.S.-China Relations: A Pathway for War Avoidance and Cooperation” (1:26:28 to 1:46:32)

6 — Ray McGovern CIA analyst/presidential briefer (ret.), co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS): “Russians Know the Horrors of War; U.S. ‘Ruling Circles’ Don’t: This is Big” (1:46:32 to 2:00:12)

7 — Q and A (2:01:00 to 3:40:35)

‘Squeezing’ More Out of Statements at Summit

By Ray McGovern, June 21, 2021

The Critical Hour interviewed me today for any further impressions I had — especially with respect to Biden’s benighted comments on China at his solo press conference (no Putin; no Russian journalists allowed), and later at the airport before he departed Geneva.

Ray on Critical Hour; June 21, 2021

The Chinese Squeeze

To remind, here is the bizarre way in which Biden described, at the post-summit presser, his approach to Putin on China:
“Without quoting him [Putin] — which I don’t think is appropriate — let me ask a rhetorical question: You got a multi-thousand-mile border with China.  China is seeking to be the most powerful economy in the world and the largest and the most powerful military in the world.”

(Sotto voce: You better think about that, “killer” Putin. A billion and a half are a lot of people to kill. … And such a long border. Just saying.)

Joe, PLEASE!, get on the plane, his co-travelers pleaded, but they could not stop the blather. Before boarding, Biden shared with the media still more wisdom — this time on China’s strategic “squeezing” of Russia:
“… let me choose my words.  Russia is in a very, very difficult spot right now. They are being squeezed by China.”

There is no escaping the conclusion that the President is out to lunch on this key issue, even (or maybe especially!) when he chooses his words carefully.

When are his rising-junior advisers going to let him in on the fact that Russia and China have never been closer — that, indeed, they have what amounts to a virtual military alliance?  This would seem to be an important thing to make sure Biden learns — and remembers.

But alas! The president has already put his foot in his mouth. Will his courtiers avoid correcting him out of fear that he might kill the messenger? (Figuratively speaking, of course. Banishing them back to a one or another Democratic “think tank” would be more likely.)

Or, worse still, do those wet-behind-the-ears advisers share the view that China is “squeezing” Putin?  Did they perhaps acquire that “intelligence” from a paid FBI informant who talked to a seemingly well-informed driver in the Chinese motor pool in Anchorage?

The Handwriting on the Wall

I was reminded recently of Robert Frost’s poem, “The Bearer of Evil Tidings”, about a messenger headed to Belshazzar’s court to deliver bad news to King Belshazzar. The messenger suddenly remembers that bad news is a very “dangerous thing to bear,” so he runs away rather than risk the monarch’s wrath.

Will the Blinken-Sullivan dynamic duo also run away? Whether they run or stay I fear Biden and his team are in for a rude awakening.  They soon enough will know the evil tidings.

Here are Frost’s final lines from “The Bearer of Evil Tidings”:

As for his evil tidings, 
Belshazzar’s overthrow, 
Why hurry to tell Belshazzar
What soon enough he would know? 

Covering the Summit: a Retrospective

By Ray McGovern

I have been musing — and have mixed emotions — about whether the June 16 Geneva summit will turn out to be the last U.S.-Russia summit I shall opt to cover — in essentially the same way I covered/supported earlier ones as a intelligence analyst in CIA’s Office of Current Intelligence. Will it perhaps turn out to be my Last (summit) Hurrah?

As a CIA specialist on Russian foreign policy, it was my privilege to help prepare presidents for summits with Moscow’s leaders — from Glassboro (June 1967; Johnson & Kosygin) to Reykyavik (October 1986; Reagan & Gorbachev).

During the early 70s when I led CIA’s Soviet Foreign Policy Branch, I detailed three of our most talented analysts to support the Strategic Arms Limitations Talks (SALT): one with the negotiating delegations in Vienna or Helsinki, one with high-tech military analysts, and one to analyze/report on what was going on for senior officials in Washington.  This helped win me a catbird seat in Moscow in May 1972 where several key arms control agreements were signed at the Nixon-Brezhnev/Kosygin summit.

The May 1972 Summit

These agreements included the Antiballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, the Interim Agreement on the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (freezing their numbers at 1972 levels for five years), and the Incidents at Sea Agreement.  As I explained in my most recent interview with Regis Tremblay (link below), CIA’s work on verification was THE sine qua non for progress — in a word, we were responsible for the second half of “Trust but Verify”.

Each U.S.-Russian summit is sui generis. In late May 2021, however, when, amid very high tension involving Ukraine, a June 16 date was abruptly set for a Biden-Putin summit, it struck me that this one was, well, in a sui generis class by itself, if you will. There would be a premium on trying to piece together the whys, wherefores, and results. And this would present a daunting challenge to analyze and report on, knowing all the while that the hired hands at the NY Times had probably already written their “analyses” before the summit even began (see below).

Back in the Day

It struck me that I might try to provide insights drawn from on my own professional experience with U.S.-Russia summits, drawing largely on the non-arcane but high-value discipline of media analysis.  I decided to transport myself to “back in the day” when U.S. taxpayers were paying me to do such work — or supervise it — without fear or favor.

I spent three pretty intensive weeks trying to figure what was going on, what was likely to happen, and what to expect post-summit. It turned out to be a high — not least because I was completely free to prescind from any and all political agendas (as we CIA analysts were normally able to do during those halcyon pre-William-Casey/cum-clone-Robert-Gates years).

Early returns on the June 16 summit are now in. I can only hope that readers/viewers of the old current-intelligence-style reporting (aka, journalism with reality-based analysis) were provided with helpful insight. 

My guess at this point is that the confused and somewhat urgent circumstances that prompted Biden to request a summit are not likely to be replicated in the next few years.  I probably should pass the baton to younger folks, now that I have reached what my attorney father used to call, jokingly, “the age of statutory senility”. But before I go …

… if any of you would be interested in how an independent, current-intelligence, reality-based analyst might approach a challenge like a high-stakes summit, I invite you to peruse the list of links below. They are arranged in reverse chronological order.

And for a touch of comic relief, I shall tack on a tweet I posted this morning:

Putin-bashing on steroids by acclaimed NYT story-teller – a baker well aware which side his bread is buttered on. For readers able to hold nose and stomach it, a prize for her/him who can find the most outright lies in Peter Baker’s 1st post-summit piece.

(The link to Peter Baker’s article is, I think appropriately, at the very bottom.)

https://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2021/06/20/please-someone-set-biden-straight-on-china-squeezing-russia/

https://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2021/06/18/will-the-micimatt-douse-lightening-flashes-of-trust/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=po5SCzwfXSw 
(Regis Tremblay post-summit interview)

https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/06/16/ray-mcgovern-trust-lacking-at-blah-summit/

https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/06/13/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-media-working-on-mousetrap-for-summit/
(By Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity)

https://raymcgovern.com/2021/06/10/summit-possibilities/
(Regis Tremblay pre-summit interview)

https://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2021/06/08/biden-putin-summit-boon-or-bust/

https://raymcgovern.com/2021/05/27/looking-toward-an-inauspicious-summit/

https://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2021/05/25/is-the-biden-putin-summit-doomed/
(It turned out — See link at top of this list — China did form the backdrop, but Biden got it 180-degrees wrong.)

=========================

Peter Baker: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/us/politics/biden-putin.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article

Summing Up the Biden-Putin Summit

By Ray McGovern

Regis Tremblay interviewed me for 43 minutes two days after the Geneva summit to review the bidding on what was achieved and what might be expected next. The interview gave me a good opportunity to reflect on what I think of any progress achieved (not much), and why (the incredible pressure any U.S. president would face in really taking on the MICIMATT).