The UN rules “arbitrary detention” in Julian Assange case. Ah, but UK Foreign Minister Philip Hammond calls the ruling “frankly ridiculous.”

Frankly, what is “frankly ridiculous” is further proof that “British Justice” is an oxymoron, as Ray learned years ago at his Irish grandmother’s knee. (She and her kin knew quite a lot about “arbitrary detention.”) So Ray found it a little much, reading Hammond’s statement that the UN finding “ignores the facts and the well recognized protections of the British legal system.” Right!

Sadly, that “legal system” has become so corrupted by subservience to U.S. diktat, that the gutsy nobles who forced the Magna Carta on King John 800 years ago must be rolling over in their graves. Same for the servile Swedes – a particular pity, since they once enjoyed a decent reputation on human rights.

(6 minutes)

When Hillary “Pulled the Plug” on Ray for His Witness at GWU 5 years ago…

In a Feb. 2014 interview Abby Martin and Mara Verheyden-Hilliard of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund recall what happened to Ray as then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton drove home the point that authorities need to respect freedom of expression – in Iran. The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund was able to get an unconstitutionally draconian BOLO (for “Be On Look-Out”) order for Ray rescinded 7 months after this interview. (8 minutes)

 

​Ray uses fresh opportunity on brief video interview to:

1-Comment on the (in)effectiveness of bulk surveillance, quoting Ed Snowden: “If you collect everything, you understand nothing;” ​

2-Ape retired East German Stasi Col. Wolfgang Schmidt on why “they” collect everything anyway.

Ray found a quiet corner in a McDonalds in Hagerstown, MD, Friday on his way south from arrest/jail/bail with the Hancock 12 on Jan. 28; he persuaded McDonalds staff to turn off the music; but it was dinner time, so the background noise is from fellow-diners.

Arrest, jail, charges with 11 other witnesses against drone killings enabled by Air Force video-game warriors of the NY State National Guard based at Hancock base, NY, was an uplifting action for Ray last Thursday.

Ray suggests that silence, inaction on this critical issue amounts to complicity.

(2 minutes)

On January 28, 2016, thirty life-size cutouts of the late Syracuse peacemaker Jerry Berrigan – brother of Dan and Phil Berrigan – blockaded the main entrance of Hancock Air National Guard Base outside Syracuse, NY. The cutouts of Jerry Berrigan were backed up by 12 live nonviolent drone resisters, who were arrested after blockading for an hour and a half. Press release (slighted edited) follows:

* * *

Jerry Berrigan Memorial Drone Blockade

Hancock Air Drone Base, Jan. 28 – Twelve Activists Arrested

On Thursday morning, January 28, thirty life sized cutouts of Syracuse peacemaker Jerry Berrigan blockaded the main entrance of Hancock Air National Guard Base outside Syracuse, NY. The 30 cutouts were accompanied by twelve, nonviolent, drone-resisters, who were arrested and jailed after blockading for an hour and a half. See 2-minute video (of the blockade and arrests).

​Jerry Berrigan, who died on July 26, 2015 at the age of 95, dedicated his entire life – like his brothers Dan and Phil – to Jesus’ command to love one another, Jerry came to the base on a bi-weekly basis whenever he was able, in his words, “to remind the base commander of our government’s pledge under the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, a treaty to safeguard non-combatant’s well-being in any warzone in which U.S. forces are engaged in combat.” And further, “to register horror and indignation at reports of bombing missions by drones in Afghanistan and Pakistan which resulted in the deaths of many innocent civilians; men, women and children.”

Those arrested and jailed for standing with the Memorial were Beth Adams, Bev Rice, Bill Ofenloch, Brian Hynes, Charley Bowman, Ed Kinane, James Ricks, Joan Pleune, Joan Wages, Pete Perry, Steve Baggarly, and Ray McGovern.

They were all charged with one misdemeanor and two violations, with the exception of Bev Rice and Joan Pleune, who were both charged with an additional misdemeanor (for allegedly violating an order of protection taken out by the base commander).

In 2008 Jerry was asked if there was anything he would change in his life. Jerry replied, “I would have resisted more often and been arrested more often.” The activists brought Jerry’s image to the gates to remember that this is where he would be, speaking out and putting his body on the line to say a clear “NO” to killing. Jerry’s widow was among the supporters on Thursday.

The group also remembered Mary Anne Grady Flores, who is serving a six-month sentence for violating an order of protection, taken out by the colonel at Hancock Air Base. Courts in rural New York apparently believe that a colonel at this highly armed base needs protection from nonviolent citizens calling attention to the drone killings.

More and more evidence mounts regarding the illegality of U.S. drone policies, from the “Drone Papers” published by The Intercept, to the four drone pilots who have come forward to speak out about what this policy is doing. (See also: http://www.democracynow.org/2015/11/20/numbing_horrible_former_drone_operator_brandon )

Those malnourished by the New York Times know next to nothing about the drone killings, much less those who believe them to be crimes.

On Thursday, activists tried to deliver a letter addressed to the Hancock military personnel, stating “Under the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice you must not be complicit in these crimes against peace, crimes against humanity and war crimes. In fact, you are required to disobey unlawful orders from a superior.”

Hancock Air Base deploys hunter/killer Reaper drones 24/7 over Afghanistan and probably elsewhere. These weaponized robotic drones are instruments of terror. They perpetrate extrajudicial killings, violate due process, violate national sovereignty, and kill non-combatants and civilians.

For more information, see The Upstate Coalition to Ground the Drones and End the Wars,

www.upstatedroneaction.org

Contacts:

Ellen Grady (607) 279-8303, demottgrady6@gmail.com

Carol Baum (315) 383-5738, carol@peacecouncil.net

The Iraq War’s KNOWN UNKNOWNS

​Rumsfeld may have been the most corrupt Pentagon leader in recent memory, but he was not alone. The Joint Chiefs of Staff under President George W. Bush fit neatly into that same category. Apparently, not much has changed since President John F. Kennedy’s Under Secretary of State George Ball used very undiplomatic language to describe the Joint Chiefs inherited by Kennedy. There is reason to believe they were among those responsible for JFK’s assassination.

The Iraq War’s Known Unknowns

 

Comments by Ray and others in a Russian documentary regarding NATO creeping eastward and missile defense were shown recently on one of Russia’s major TV channels, provoking a lot of discussion. The film ends with a clip of Ray reciting a (universally human) poem by Nikolay Nekrasov, “Heeding the Horrors of War,” at the EU Parliament in Brussels on Dec. 1, 2015.

http://space4peace.blogspot.com/2016/01/russian-tv-covers-star-wars-us-nato.html

(Those wishing to hear the poem can go to minute 47:18 – or can start a minute before to see John Lennon and Yoko Ono, as well. The first time Ray thought it appropriate to recite this poem to a Russian audience was in late April 2015, at a tree-planting commemoration in Moscow of the 70th anniversary of the meeting of Russian and American forces on the Elbe, April 25, 1945, two weeks before V/E day. Translation is pasted in below.)

Hat tip to Bruce Gagnon, coordinator of The Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space. Last fall he and other Maine activists protested the Bath Iron Works “christening” of an Aegis destroyer with missile defense systems, which in turn inspired the Russian filmmaker to do a wider documentary dealing also with Russia’s concerns over encirclement by U.S./NATO.

Since this could end up destroying the whole lot of us before climate changes does; since Western media dismiss it all as Russian propaganda (if they mention it at all); and since Moscow’s very real concerns are pooh-poohed or dismissed as paranoia – perhaps it’s time to revisit some of the things President Vladimir Putin said publicly shortly after the U.S.-sponsored, largely fascist-led coup in Kiev on Feb. 22, 2014, which “regime-changed” the duly elected government of Ukraine:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On April 17, 2014, six weeks after what has been (rightly) called “the most blatant coup in history” (George Friedman, President of STRATFOR, Dec. 2014, on the coup in Kiev), Putin held a Q and A session on Russian TV. In answer to a question, Putin said the following:

“We were promised … that after Germany’s unification, NATO wouldn’t spread eastward. … However, it started expanding by incorporating former Warsaw Pact member-countries and later on, the Baltic states, former Soviet republics.

“I used to say at one time: ‘Why are you doing this?” … I heard in response: ‘This doesn’t concern you.’…

“But … when the infrastructure of a military bloc approaches our borders, we have grounds for certain apprehensions and questions. … this compels us to counteract. …

“Missile defense … is no less, and probably even more important, than NATO’s eastward expansion. Incidentally, our decision on Crimea was partially prompted by this.

“Needless to say, first and foremost we wanted to support the residents of Crimea, but we also followed certain logic: If we don’t do anything, Ukraine will be drawn into NATO sometime in the future. We’ll be told: ‘This doesn’t concern you,’ and NATO ships will dock in Sevastopol, the city of Russia’s naval glory. …

“But if NATO troops walk in, they will immediately deploy these forces there. Such a move would be geopolitically sensitive for us because, in this case, Russia would be practically ousted from the Black Sea area. We’d be left with just a small coastline of 450 or 600km, and that’s it!

“This is a serious thing. So … we must consider these circumstances and react accordingly. …

“US missile defense … is not a defensive system, but part of the offensive potential deployed far away from home. Again we’re being told: ‘This is not against you.’

“However, at the expert level, everyone understands very well that if these systems are deployed closer to our borders, our ground-based strategic missiles will be within their striking range. Everyone is well aware of this, but we’re being told: ‘Please believe us, this is not against you.’…

“If they deploy these elements in Europe, we’ll have to do something in response, as we’ve said so many times. But this means an escalation of the arms race! Why do this?

“It would be much better to look at this issue and determine if there are missile threats from some directions and decide how this system should be controlled or accessed. It would be sensible to do it together, but no, they don’t want that.”

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The following day (March 18, 2014) Russia annexed Crimea. In a formal address to State Duma deputies in the Kremlin, Putin addressed these serious issues but chose at one point a more jocular touch about most NATO sailors being “wonderful guys, but…” (see below):

“We have already heard declarations from Kiev about Ukraine soon joining NATO. What would this have meant for Crimea and Sevastopol in the future? It would have meant that NATO’s navy would be right there, and this would create not an illusory but a perfectly real threat to the whole of southern Russia. These are things that could have become reality were it not for the choice the Crimean people made, and I want to say thank you to them for this.

“But let me say too that we are not opposed to cooperation with NATO. [But] NATO remains a military alliance, and we are against having a military alliance making itself at home right in our backyard or in our historic territory. I simply cannot imagine that we would travel to Sevastopol to visit NATO sailors. Of course, most of them are wonderful guys, but it would be better to have them come and visit us, be our guests, rather than the other way around.”

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Внимая ужасам войны,

Heeding the horrors of war,

При каждой новой жертве боя

At every new victim of battle

Мне жаль не друга, не жены,

I feel sorry not for his friend, nor for his wife,

Мне жаль не самого героя.

I feel sorry not even for the hero himself.

Увы! утешится жена,

Alas, the wife will be comforted,

И друга лучший друг забудет;

And best friends forget their friend;

Но где-то есть душа одна –

But somewhere there is one soul –

Она до гроба помнить будет!

Who will remember unto the grave!

Средь лицемерных наших дел

Amidst the hypocrisy of our affairs

И всякой пошлости и прозы

And all the banality and triviality

Одни я в мир подсмотрел

Unique among what I have observed in the world

Святые, искренние слезы –

Sacred, sincere tears –

То слезы бедных матерей!

The tears of poor mothers!

Им не забыть своих детей,

They do not forget their own children,

Погибших на кровавой ниве,

Who have perished on the bloody battlefield,

Как не поднять плакучей иве

Just as the weeping willow never lifts

Своих поникнувших ветвей.

Its dangling branches.

On the eve of President Obama’s last State of the Union address, Ray and Eugene Puryear discussed Obama’s legacy so far.

On “Loud and Clear,” Sputnik’s Brian Becker led an hour-long radio tour d’horizon, which focused mostly on what Ray called Obama’s legacy of putting steroids on the Military-Industrial Complex, about which President Eisenhower warned in his own Farewell Address.

Under Obama the MIC cancer has metastasized. Apres Obama, the Deep State will ensure that the disease continues to spread, UNLESS we-the-people step up and apply uncommonly strong therapy to our ailing body politic … and soon.

Call the disease late-stage Military-Industrial-Congressional-Media-Security Services Complex — usually fatal.

http://sputniknews.com/radio_loud_and_clear/20160112/1032989850/the-last-state-of-the-union.html