​“Ukrainian Weekly” Highlights Letter Taking Ray to Task

Letters to the Editor: A CIA official’s advice on Ukraine

“By Staff”

Dear Editor:

On June 28, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) wrote an opinion article in The Washington Post in which he comments on his and two other senators’ recent return trip to Ukraine. Sen. McCain argues that “the ceasefire with Russia is fiction, and U.S. assistance is vital to deterring further Russian aggression.” He goes on to state: ”President Obama has wrongly argued that providing Ukraine with the assistance and equipment it needs to defend itself would provoke Russia. Putin needed no provocation to invade Ukraine and annex Crimea.” The senator stresses that “it is the weakness of the collective U.S. and European response that provokes the very aggression we seek to avoid.”

On June 30 the newspaper printed a response by Ray McGovern of Arlington, Va., who claims that Sen. McCain was wrong to say that Vladimir Putin annexed Crimea without provocation. Mr. McGovern describes the events on the Maidan as “the coup in Kiev” [sic], which was “provocation enough.” This nonsense could be dismissed as another pro-Russian troll parroting the Russian line, were it not for the newspaper identifying the writer as “former chief of the Soviet Foreign Policy Branch of the CIA.” On his webpage, Mr. McGovern says that he “served as CIA analyst for 27 years, from the administration of John F. Kennedy to that of George H.W. Bush” and his “duties included chairing National Intelligence Estimates and preparing the President’s Daily Brief.”

On March 3, 2014, Mr. McGovern and Prof. Timothy Snyder of Yale University were interviewed by journalist Amy Goodman on the independent news program “Democracy Now!” in a debate on the topic of “Who is provoking unrest in Ukraine?” Throughout the whole discussion, Mr. McGovern constantly referred to “the Ukraine” and warned the U.S. government that “you go a bridge too far when you threaten a strategic interest the Russians consider so sensitive as the [sic] Ukraine.” When Prof. Snyder reminded him that ”Ukraine is a sovereign country” and that Ukrainians on the Maidan “complained that we [Americans and Europeans] were far too close to the Russians, that in effect we were helping the Russians hurt them,” Mr. McGovern responded: “Russian interests exist, and they have since the ninth century, OK? That’s where Russia began, you know, Kievan Rus’, in Kiev.”

On April 22 of this year, the online English-language version of Moscow’s Pravda printed an article headlined “Ex-CIA officer Ray McGovern: V-E Day celebration spoiled by Washington’s support for Ukrainian revolution.” The headline speaks for itself. In the article, Mr. McGovern writes about “the U.S.-arranged coup d’état of Feb. 22, 2014 in Kiev.”

One can only shudder at the thought of what kind of advice this high-ranking CIA official provided to various presidential administrations concerning Ukraine.

Leo Iwaskiw
Philadelphia

++++++++++++++++++++++

Here’s Ray’s letter to which Mr. Iwaskiw took offense:

Letters to the Editor, Washington Post, July 1, 2015

McCain, Ukraine and Mr. Putin

In his June 28 Sunday Opinion essay, “The Ukraine cease-fire fiction,” Sen. John McCain was wrong to write that Russian President Vladimir Putin annexed Crimea without provocation.

What about the coup in Kiev on Feb. 22, 2014, that replaced President Viktor Yanukovych with pro-Western leaders favoring membership in NATO? Was that not provocation enough?

This glaring omission is common in The Post. The March 10 World Digest item “Putin had early plan to annex Crimea” described a “secret meeting” Mr. Putin held on Feb. 23, 2014, during which “Russia decided it would take the Crimean Peninsula.” No mention was made of the coup the previous day.

I have searched in vain for credible evidence that, before the coup, Mr. Putin had any intention to annex Crimea. George Friedman, the widely respected president of the think tank Stratfor, has described the putsch on Feb. 22, 2014, as “the most blatant coup in history.”

Ray McGovern, Arlington
The writer is former chief of the Soviet Foreign Policy Branch of the CIA.

Regarding Malaysia Airlines flight MH17

WASHINGTON, July 15. /TASS/. The West has ignored the need for an unbiased investigation into the downing of a Malaysia airliner over eastern Ukraine last year and embarked on a path of sweeping accusations against the people’s militias in the Donbass region, an ex-CIA official told TASS on Wednesday.

Ray McGovern, a retired Central Intelligence Agency analyst, was commenting on the controversy surrounding the idea of creating an international tribunal to prosecute those suspected of having shot down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17.

“A truly independent investigation is what the world and a decent respect for the opinions of mankind and honoring those killed requires,” McGovern said. “Finding and bringing to Justice those responsible for downing MH17 should be given absolutely top priority. But, sadly, absolute priority was given from the start — without persuasive evidence — to blaming ‘pro-Russian separatists’.”

McGovern, who for 27 years served seven U.S. presidents and regularly prepared daily security briefings for former presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, pointed to the fact that ahead of the first anniversary of the disaster on July 17, it was certain “the U.S. (and Russia) know more now than a year ago”.

“Surely, in the year that has passed, better intelligence has been gathered than that which was available when [U.S. Secretary of State John] Kerry made his accusations. It strains credulity beyond the breaking point to suggest that more precise and persuasive intelligence has not been gathered over a whole year,” he said, noting however that “when asked, U.S. intelligence spokespersons contend that there is no additional evidence since Kerry’s rush to judgment on July 20, 2014.”

“One would surmise that if the U.S. had any persuasive evidence to support Kerry’s charges, Kerry or someone else would be shouting it from the rooftops as part of Washington’s current anti-Russia propaganda campaign,” McGovern said. “I can only conclude that the U.S. – now, as when Kerry leveled the charges — either has no persuasive evidence to support its charges, or has collected intelligence that does not fit with Kerry’s charges and thus is being suppressed.

Russian version (with different lead-in):

http://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/2121195

Международная панорама

15 июля

Экс-сотрудник ЦРУ: Запад сделал ставку на обвинение ополченцев в уничтожении Boeing

+++++++++++++++++++++

Если бы американским властям удалось подкрепить теорию о том, что лайнер был сбит ополченцами, то “госсекретарь США Джон Керри или кто-либо еще кричали бы об этом с крыш”, считает бывший разведчик

[If American leaders could substantiate their theory that the airliner was destroyed by the people’s militias …, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, says the former intelligence officer.]

++++++++++++++++++++

ВАШИНГТОН, 15 июля. /Корр.ТАСС Дмитрий Кирсанов/.

После катастрофы Boeing-777 “Малайзийских авиалиний” на Украине 17 июля 2014 года Запад пошел по пути огульных обвинений в случившемся ополченцев Донбасса и игнорирования необходимости проведения объективного разбирательства обстоятельств трагедии. Такое мнение высказал корр.ТАСС ветеран американской разведки Реймонд Макговерн, комментируя противоречия вокруг идеи создания международного трибунала для привлечения к ответственности виновных в уничтожении авиалайнера.

​An Obama Anniversary Worth Noting

by Ray

We should have seen it coming. Exactly eight years ago came a clear sign that prudence dictated a hard look into the mouth of this gift (Trojan?) horse running for President. It was Barack Obama’s capitulation to NSA and the giant telecoms that should have raised our antennae higher.

As soon as Obama-the-candidate went back on his earlier promise, and said he had decided to vote, after all, for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act legislation holding the telecoms and NSA harmless for having trashed the Bill of Rights, Ray wrote him a letter. Neither Obama nor John Brennan, the trustee who had just become Obama’s principal adviser on such issues, wrote back.

For a trip down memory lane, here’s the text, originally posted on afterdowningstreet.org:

http://warisacrime.org/node/34526

* * *

Ray McGovern’s Response to Obama’s FISA Explanation
It’s a Deal Breaker for This Intelligence Officer
Submitted by Ray McGovern on July 3, 2008 – 11:11pm.

July 3, 2008

Dear Senator Obama,

I speak from 30 years of experience in intelligence work. I don’t know who actually briefed you on the eavesdropping legislation, but the bill is unnecessary for intelligence collection and POISON for our civil liberties—not even to mention the unconscionable retroactive immunity provision.

You have made a big mistake, Senator, in indicating you intend to vote for it. There is still time to change your mind. That’s what big people do.

Your penultimate paragraph seals it for me. What you are saying relies not on principle—and still less on respect for the law, or respect for our Constitutional rights.

What I hear you saying is an all too familiar refrain: “Tough s___, progressive voter. You know you’ve got nowhere else to go. You want McCain in there?”

A painful reminder that the Republicans have no corner on arrogance. You think you have us over a barrel. Well let me tell you something those suits from K Street haven’t told you; you need our active support, and you are about to blow it.

Your “explanation” was unworthy of one who has sworn to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States (including the Fourth Amendment).

And your attitude is not that of a person I THOUGHT was different—and would be genuinely for change I could believe in.

We live just a couple of miles from where George Mason is buried. (As you may remember, professor of the Constitution that you have been, Mason actually refused to approve the Constitution—although he and fellow Virginian James Madison had pretty much drafted it—BECAUSE IT LACKED THE BILL OF RIGHTS).

Well, the air is still this evening. Our windows are open and George Mason can be heard tossing and turning in his grave, loudly moaning. Yes, moaning.

I went over to his grave; between the moans he explained that he had just heard of your plan to play fast and loose with his beloved Bill of Rights. “Hard to enjoy the Fourth tomorrow with the Constitution being shredded Right and Left,” he whispered.

Remember, Senator, what Emerson said about those unable to change their “little” minds. Beware the K Street hobgoblins!

Again: Dissing us by the “So-you-want-McCain?” riposte is unworthy. Not only is it clear that you are “mis-underestimating” us but, frankly, I find it insulting.

Please get back on track.

Respectfully,
Ray McGovern
US Army Infantry/Intelligence Officer: 1962-64
CIA Analyst, 1963-1990
Co-Founder, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

 

Ray Gets Letter Printed in WashPost

Letters to the Editor, Washington Post, July 1, 2015

McCain, Ukraine and Mr. Putin

In his June 28 Sunday Opinion essay, “The Ukraine cease-fire fiction,” Sen. John McCain was wrong to write that Russian President Vladimir Putin annexed Crimea without provocation.

What about the coup in Kiev on Feb. 22, 2014, that replaced President Viktor Yanukovych with pro-Western leaders favoring membership in NATO? Was that not provocation enough?

This glaring omission is common in The Post. The March 10 World Digest item “Putin had early plan to annex Crimea” described a “secret meeting” Mr. Putin held on Feb. 23, 2014, during which “Russia decided it would take the Crimean Peninsula.” No mention was made of the coup the previous day.

I have searched in vain for credible evidence that, before the coup, Mr. Putin had any intention to annex Crimea. George Friedman, the widely respected president of the think tank Stratfor, has described the putsch on Feb. 22, 2014, as “the most blatant coup in history.”

Ray McGovern, Arlington

The writer is former chief of the Soviet Foreign Policy Branch of the CIA.

​Formal Presentation of Framed Sam Adams Award Citation to Bill Binney

The occasion was the annual meeting of the Academy of Philosophy and Letters, June 13, 2015, at the BWI Doubletree Hotel — oddly, surrounded by NSA buildings in Linthicum, MD. John Henry of the Committee for the Republic hosted the evening program titled: “The National Security Agency’s War on the U.S. Constitution”

Main speakers were William Binney, Kirk Wiebe, Thomas Drake, and James Bamford. Bruce Fein, John Henry, and Ray McGovern also spoke.

The Committee for the Republic was eager provide an appropriate occasion for Binney to receive the framed citation (in English and German) for the Sam Adams Award for Integrity in Intelligence. The paper citation and traditional corner-brightener candlestick holder was originally presented to Binney at an SRO ceremony in Berlin on January 22, 2015.

Ed Snowden, who was live-streamed into that Berlin ceremony, emphasized, “Without Bill Binney there would be no Ed Snowden.” Bill, in turn, had been greatly encouraged by the courageous, principled stand taken by Tom Drake in facing down the U.S. Department of Justice and NSA successfully, after four years of persecution that included government-provided “evidence” proven in Court to have been forged.

Actually, in a very real sense, it was a triple play: Drake to Binney to Snowden. So it was altogether appropriate that Tom Drake be the former Sam Adams Associate honoree to present the framed award to Bill Binney on June 13, 2015 in the belly of the (NSA) beast.

Tom also had been the clear choice of his colleague Sam Adams Associates to present the 2013 award for integrity to Ed Snowden in Moscow on October 7, 2013. As soon as Ed surfaced in Hong Kong, he made it clear that U.S. government abuse of Tom had convinced Ed that he had to leave the U.S. in order to achieve his mission and have some chance — however slight it seemed at the time — of avoiding spending the rest of his life in prison.

Hats off to Drake to Binney to Snowden: courageous patriots all!