The Why Behind the Benghazi Attack

Mel Goodman
November 4, 2012

The Why Behind the Benghazi Attack

Ray is proud to claim former CIA analyst Mel Goodman, a former CIA analyst, as friend and colleague. His integrity got him in deep trouble with Robert Gates, who, as soon as Ronald Reagan was elected, became a devout protege of Director William Casey and very soon head of CIA analysis.

Gates could not abide anyone questioning the “growing Soviet threat” even in places where the Soviets were taking it on the chin and withdrawing with red tails between their legs..

Mel is almost unique, inasmuch as he had the guts to quit the CIA and then testify openly, supported by several other in-place CIA analysts, against Gates’ subsequent nomination to be CIA Director.

In the end, another Gates patron, Sen. David Boren of Oklahoma, then-head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, together with his loyal staff director, George Tenet, put in the fix. They turned to ex-prosecutor Sen. Warren Rudman to do an unconscionably deceitful attack on Mel. Still, 31 Senators voted against Gates — an unprecedented number — before or since.

After he left the CIA, Mel was a professor at the National Defense University for many years before retiring a few years ago.

 

Why Ray Believes Netanyahu is Backing Off on Iran: Oct. 2 radio interview:

http://scotthorton.org/2012/10/02/100212-ray-mcgovern/

Interviewer Scott Horton cites Ray’s recent piece on this issue, and asks why the change from Ray’s more alarmist warnings over the past several months.

Answer: when new evidence comes in, one needs to be open to letting it change your mind. In other words, Emerson was right when he wrote:

“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds; adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.”

The interview also deals with possibility that AIPAC may well have lost influence, under the impact of Netanyahu’s bullying and bluster. That an incident cannot be ruled out, however, is clear from neocons like WINEP’s Patrick Clawson openly advocating provoking Iran into war.

Ray talks about his (and about 80 other activists’) recent diner in New York with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and how he (Ray) managed to resist the temptation to sing a new verse from Porgy and Bess’s “That ain’t necessarily so,” to the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Tape of interview runs for 24 minutes, from min. 2:00 to 26:00.

 

Israel and Iran: Facts ≠ Fear — Ray Talk Playing on LINK TV

Ray’s Sept. 2 speech (and the Q&A following) on Israel & Iran: Facts ≠ Fear starts showing on LINK TV Friday, Sept. 21, at 3:00 Eastern. Ray gave the talk at a benefit for a Justice-oriented non-profit he admires very much – the Middle East Children’s Alliance (MECA) in Berkeley, CA. LINK TV has provided the schedule for its running (six more times in the coming days).

http://www.linktv.org/programs/ray-mcgovern-israel-and-iran

Coming off a week of vacation and even some quiet thinking in the northern California sun, and looking forward to a Labor Day weekend with our grandchildren in the Bay area, Ray was rested and relaxed – perhaps too much so. The MECA T-shirt you see him wearing says: “I’m living on 24 liters of water a day in solidarity with Palestinians under Israeli occupation.” (He is continuing to try to do that, having failed miserably at his first attempt during one of those vacation days.)

Ray comes through typically strong on the possibility Netanyahu might mousetrap Obama into joining in hostilities against Iran. Gen. Martin Dempsey’s public statement (“I don’t want to be complicit, if they [the Israelis] choose to do it [bomb Iran]”), and the Obama administration’s reaction to the various indignities inflicted by Netanyahu over recent weeks do suggest that we can breathe a bit easier. But the next six weeks will be critical.

Ray continues to believe that the key factor remains Netanyahu’s concept of how far he can push the American President, who has shown himself eminently pushable, and how much weight he thinks his American neocon ideologues/strategic savants can bring to bear on the White House.

There is much riding for Netanyahu and other right-wingers as they look toward the U.S. election. They want to give Iran a very bloody nose – actually “obliterate” it, if possible – while there is still time – i. e., before Obama might win a second term. If he does, there is always the possibility that he would grow and show some backbone regarding the Middle East – that he might, just might, act with some integrity and justice.

That, of course, is Netanyahu’s worst fear. And that is why it would be best to avoid letting ourselves breathe much easier about an October or early-November surprise, until the day after the election. Here is Alan Hart’s latest; he is one of the best: What Might Netanyahu Do If Romney’s Defeat Becomes Inevitable

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32489.htm