Student Petition Protests Commencement Speaker (John O. Brennan)

By Emily Arata, The Fordham Ram, March 28, 2012

http://www.theramonline.com/news/student-petition-protests-commencement-speaker-1.2721204#.T3NwriOGz-k

John Brennan’s Selection as Fordham’s 167th Commencement Speaker: Stand Against This Outrage
Initiated by Fordham students Michael Pappas and Scott McDonald
http://www.change.org/petitions/john-brennan-s-selection-as-fordham-s-167th-commencement-speaker-stand-against-this-outrage

We ask that Fordham University choose an alternative commencement speaker
Initiated by students at Fordham campus at Lincoln Center
http://www.change.org/petitions/fordham-university-students-we-ask-that-fordham-university-choose-an-alternative-commencement-speaker

OTHER ARTICLE SPECIFIC TO FORDHAM

McGovern Protests Brennan’s Speech

 

IRAN: WILL ISRAEL ATTACK BEFORE U.S. ELECTION?

Netanyahu v Obama: What Next?


http://www.alanhart.net/netanyahu-v-obama-what-next/

This article by one of the most experienced and credible specialists on the Middle East is six months old. It was just brought to my attention; it is the best I’ve seen on the issue.

I think Alan Hart has it right. And that is precisely why all steps should be taken to prevent a “false-flag” incident from getting us involved in a war with Iran.

At very least, the U.S. Navy and its Iranian counterpart need to be able to communicate directly with each other. A Pentagon proposal to enable this has been hung up in the Senate for over two months, apparently by senior Senators who look favorably, or at least with equanimity, at the prospect of war with Iran.

 

US Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb

Four Saturdays ago, the NY Times had a fact-based, page-one report on what U.S. Intelligence has been saying since 2007 about the (non-existent since 2003) Iranian nuclear WEAPONS program. The article’s appearance was a shock. Cynics dismiss it as a CYA operation, enabling the Times to dig out the article after the fact (of all hell breaking loose with Iran and still no sign of an active nuclear weapons effort there), and represent it as evidence that the Times had it right all along. We should, I suppose, be thankful for small favors. The Times avoided such precautions prior to the attack on Iraq….no doubt because it was going to be a “cakewalk,” remember?

nytimes.com/2012/02/25/world/middleeast/us-agencies-see-no-move-by-iran-to-build-a-bomb.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Risen%20AND%20Mazzetti%20AND%20Clapper&st=cse