Ray Talks About Gorbachev and US-Russian Relations

VIDEO, August 30 (7 minutes)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-bBilRyaVEeopXYmWMVxMR-EUQ2hErtt/view

My best job at CIA was conducting the one-on-one early morning briefings of The President’s Daily Brief and updating it with Vice President George H. W. Bush, Secretary of State George Shultz, and Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger during President Ronald Reagan’s first term – 1981-85. (The president preferred to sleep in, and would usually be briefed later in the morning by the above, plus his national security adviser.)

This was the time when Mikhail Gorbachev was coming into prominence – eventually becoming head of the Communist Party and President of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev had been virtually unknown, so it was easy for Weinberger, CIA Director William Casey and his protégé Robert Gates to paint Gorbachev as simply another Commie – just a more polished, clever one – and assure Reagan that the Soviet Communist Party would NEVER change: nor would it EVER EVER give up power peacefully.

I found myself in a unique position to critique that benighted attitude by providing my own views (citing concrete evidence), though only, of course, when asked to by the people I was briefing.

Teflon-coated Robert Gates, whom some folks still look up to, has not changed. In his book, “Duty”, he responded dismissively to those warning that Russia would be alarmed by the emplacement of offensive missiles in places like Romania, Poland, and the Black Sea: “Making the Russians happy wasn’t exactly on my to-do list.” So here we are today with “unprovoked” war in Ukraine.

During my interview with RT International last evening, I could not resist the temptation to record my brief meeting with Gorbachev when Gates’s name came up. Our until-then cordial conversation ended abruptly as Gorbachev’s face turned cold. “привет ему” (give him a greeting), Gorbachev said. He had been on record, long since, as deeming Gates a major impediment to decent relations between Washington and Moscow. For all we know, Gates may still have the ear of neophytes like Jake Sullivan and Antony Blinken.

The “Inevitable Annoyance of China”

The US is naively insisting that “nothing has changed” post-Pelosi. “In coming weeks” US warships will sail thru the Taiwan Strait, underscoring international waterway status to the “inevitable annoyance of China.” Someone please tell Biden that “Annoyance” may include shots across the bow…

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/chinas-navy-begins-erase-imaginary-taiwan-strait-median-line-2022-08-25/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=daily-briefing&utm_term=08-26-2022

Ray McGovern [and Michael Wong] on the US/Russia/China Triangle and Danger of Nuclear War

An interview that is ageing well; posted on August 8, 2022; but conducted on May 23, 2022

Truth in Advertising: Feel free to watch Ray at the beginning of this interview, BUT by far the most interesting remarks come from interviewer Michael Wong who has a lot more than just book knowledge on China.

Michael is, in effect, interviewed by Ray starting at about minute 45. So, you may wish to fast-forward to that point  – particularly if you hear Ray repeating things you may have heard from him.

Michael Wong’s comments turn out to be unusually prescient in the light of the current crisis over Taiwan.  Bear in mind that this interview was conducted on May 23, 2022. Ray has learned a lot from Michael Wong.

Right-Wing SKYNEWS/Australia Ridicules Zelensky

By Ray McGovern, August 4, 2022

After watching my recent interview on SKYNEWS ( See: https://raymcgovern.com/2022/08/03/rays-likely-last-as-in-final-appearance-on-skynews-australia/ ) an Australian friend sent me this MUST-WATCH, 5-miute video.

You hear the Australian commentator say, “I can’t bite my tongue any longer.”

Well, good for him; and good for SKYNEWS/Australia for allowing him to un-bite his tongue. So many tongues keep getting bitten in Western corporate media outlets that it seems something of a miracle that some commentators do not drown on their own blood.

Also Making Sense, Dmitri Trenin

REQUIRED READING: Dmitri Trenin: Russia cannot afford to lose in Ukraine, but neither can the US – is there a non-nuclear way out of the deadlock? An escalation can lead to a bigger and more dangerous conflict. Are Moscow and Washington ready to take the risk?

By Dmitri Trenin, member of the Russian International Affairs Council
https://www.rt.com/russia/560055-escalation-conflict-ukraine-nato/

Granted, Trenin is a Russian, but in his case the de rigueur sneer/snub reflexively applied is entirely inappropriate. He is also the former Director of the Carnegie Moscow Center and former research fellow at the NATO Defense College in Rome. Sane Russian specialists in the U.S. (granted, an endangered species) give Trenin the very respectful hearing he has earned over decades.

Making Nonsense: Today’s Blather in the NYT

The BS never stops. Ukraine Builds a Case That Killing of P.O.W.s Was a Russian War Crime
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/03/world/europe/russia-ukraine-prisoners-killed.html

Well, good luck, Kyiv, building that case. Here the Times is adhering to its long tradition of publishing all the news that’s fit to print to get the U.S. into war. The particular drivel from today, however, should earn Times reporters Michael Schwirtz, Christiaan Triebert, Kamila Hrabchuk and Stanislav Kozliuk a ‘Pulitzer Prize for yellow journalism’.

Their article is transparent – not worth the time to debunk in any detail. But just assume that, for some reason, the Russians wanted to kill valuable Ukrainian P.O.W.s who are providing first-hand intelligence on the infamous pro-Nazi Azov troops – first-hand because they are from those same units. Why would the Russians want to kill them? OK, assuming that, for some reason, they did want to kill them, are there not easier ways to do away with P.O.W.s in your custody than to launch a precision missile strike?

The Gray Lady has become a lady of the night.

NATO-China: How Will Europe React to Pelosi-gate?

Ray interviewed on The Critical Hour
By Ray McGovern, August 2, 2022

The interview came just a couple of hours after Nancy Pelosi’s plane landed in Taiwan, so we focused on how top European officials are likely to react to what China – and not only China – considers a grave, gratuitous provocation.

With NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg having recently announced a “fundamental shift” east to include China as a “systemic challenge”, and with the proxy war in Ukraine going south, will the leaders of Europe follow the likes of Jake Sullivan and Antony Blinken and, lemming-like, jump off the cliff – alienating China as well as Russia?

We noted that Russia today was swift in supporting China’s stand on the Pelosi visit – as swift as China was in supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February. Would sensible leaders in Europe really want to take on both Russia AND China just because the naive twins, Sullivan and Blinken, think it’s a good idea?