Ray Interviewed by Rob Kall: PART 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzwyY66P7cc
September 7 (56 minutes)

Among the issues discussed:

— Rob asks about CIA, as an institution, missing the fall of the Soviet Union: It was the result of ideological blinders, rank ambition, and naked careerism. (No one was held responsible, so the same malleable managers concocted fraudulent “intelligence” for war on Iraq.)

— Coup in Kiev (“most blatant coup in history,” advertised on YouTube two and a half weeks before); predictable reaction by Moscow catalyzes plummet in Russia-U.S. relations.

— How Putin handled Crimea, contrasted with the “ukaz”-approach of Khrushchev 60 years earlier.

— Donald Trump clearly not his own man. Best evidence of that is letting John Bolton (one of the well known Washington “crazies”) be foisted opon him; we are talking about the criminally insane.

— The President’s Daily Brief: how it was with Reagan, compared with Nixon and Ford.  And how even that (formerly sacrosanctity honest) briefing came to be corrupted — especially under George Tenet and Mikey Morell.

— After the fraudulent intelligence “justifying” war on Iraq, honest leaders and analysts played a huge role in preventing an even more disastrous war with Iran.  Camelot for intelligence analysis.

— Freudian slip: Ray says CIA instead of NY Times; recovers and refers (correctly) to the NYT as a “CIA Annex.”  Did the NYT help GW Bush win a second term in 2004 by hiding — for 15 months — what James Risen had unearthed months before the election about gross violations of the 4th Amendment order by Bush and Cheney?  Jill Abramson having the temerity to actually brag about what the Times did reflects the conviction that the American people should leave it to the hoi aristoi of the NYT to decide what to tell them — what should be withheld and what may be “fit to print.”

— “You are a ‘conspiracy theorist’” = the perfect squelch. Used effectively by Allen Dulles, for example, to marginalize those objecting to having him (one of the prime suspects of involvement in the assassination of John Kennedy) pretty much run the Warren Commission.

— CIA “Vault 7” cyber-tools revealed in March 2017 via a leak from a CIA whistleblower. One tool, Marble Framework can — inadvertently or ‘advertently’ — leave behind Cyrillic writing to “obfuscate” who hacked into a computer or server.  This tool was used in 2016.  Might this have anything to do with hacking blamed on Russia?

Reluctant to connect any such dots, the NYT has avoided Marble Framework like the plague. Fortunately, Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post did not “get the memo” in time. Those interested can dig out her write-up of Marble Framework at:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/wikileaks-latest-release-of-cia-cyber-tools-could-blow-the-cover-on-agency-hacking-operations/2017/03/31/63fc3616-1636-11e7-833c-503e1f6394c9_story.html?utm_term=.d9eaa10c6341

WikiLeaks described the Vault 7 disclosures as “the largest ever publication of confidential documents on the agency.”  Retaliation was swift in coming. Less than two weeks after the Marble Framework disclosure, Trump administration heavyweight, then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo, labeled Assange “and his ilk …  demons” running “a non-state hostile intelligence service.” Giving hypocrisy a bad name, Pompeo added that Assange is “a coward hiding behind a screen.”
https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2017-speeches-testimony/pompeo-delivers-remarks-at-csis.html…

Pompeo’s speech was, pure and simple, meretricious demagoguery, even allowing for the fact that Pompeo may sincerely believe in demons. No recent invective quite as bad comes immediately to mind.  In Pompeo we have corporeal proof that you can get all “A’s” at West Point and still flunk life — not to mention Duty, Honor, Country and the U.S. Constitution.

It took Pompeo a year, but he has been able to persuade the Ecuadorian government to hold Assange in virtual solitary confinement in its embassy in London, where he has been held incommunicado since late March 2018.  The odds are probably no better than even that Assange would rather be in Kansas, if Pompeo represents the kind of folks Kansans celebrate.

Ray Interviewed by Rob Kall

On Sept. 7, 2018 Ray gave two relaxed video interviews to Rob Kall, founder of the excellent website opednews.com. The first is here:
https://youtu.be/F71mtPKbYwo
(60 minutes)

Among the issues discussed:

— Impeachment: why Conyers wouldn’t; why we should; the wisdom of the Founders

— Syria: Trump’s neocons keep the pot boiling for Israel

— Putin: Would someone please tell me who is in charge in Washington?

— KEY FACTOR; the media never worse; sadly, including “progressive” media

— Ser Cristiano hoy en día significa no temer, no callar por miedo — Romero. Trying to follow the example of a murdered Palestinian Jew named Issa (in Arabic)

 
— Dan Berrigan on the “secondary” importance of “results.”
 
— What moves one to risk arrest, getting beaten up? What was the first time like?

— The key advantage enjoyed by people with gray hair; the moral imperative, hoy en dia, to put that advantage into play

— Shameless plug for raymcgovern.com: If you don’t get it, you don’t get it! :))

Part 2 (the 2nd interview) coming tomorrow.

FUKUS & Turkey are now al-qa’ida’s allies. (editorial)

Syria: Col. Patrick Lang, US Army (ret.) and former Defense Intelligence Officer for Near East, forecasts: “In the end, the Russians and Syrians will say to hell with this and launch the offensive [into Idlib].”
 
FUKUS & Turkey are now al-qa’ida’s allies. (editorial)
Sept. 14, 2018
“FUKUS equals France, the UK and the US.  It appears that the policy of this tri-partite re-birth of the Entente Cordiale has changed with regard to Syria since the middle of August.  Before that change FUKUS seemed to have acknowledged and conceded the inevitability of an R+6 offensive that would re-capture all of Idlib Province in NW Syria.  That seems changed.
“The province is now occupied and dominated by the jihadi fighters of hayat tahrir al-sham (HTS).  This is the cover name of al-qa’ida in Syria.  You may probably remember them as the folks who attacked the US on 9/11.  If you do,That would be a correct memory.  These jihadis are quite different from the ISIS (daesh) fighters of the Islamic State.  The US, Syria, Iraq, France and the UK have successfully fought ISIS all over Syria and Iraq when FUKUS was not busy Accidental-Bombing (neologism) the Syrian Army.
“FUKUS and the Lord of the White House  (LOTWH) have traditionally made a clear distinction between ISIS and the other jihadi groups like HTS.  Over the years of the Syrian Civil War FUKUS has insisted, and still does, that HTS is somehow a “freedom fighter” group along with the rag-tag Free Syrian Army unicorns.  That was certainly the view of the late Saint John of Arizona.  In the aftermath of his passing and the subsequent media hysteria, the LOTWH seems to have accepted the wisdom of St. John in perceiving the “true” nature of HTS.
“In  other words the US seems now to be fully “on board” as the protector of HTS’s redoubt in Idlib Province.  The French, still deep in the embrace of Macronisme and the Brits with their desire to continue to be “players” are also “on board”
“In pursuit of these newly adopted neocon policy ambitions for al-qa’ida in Syria, Ambassadors Jeffrey and Haley have threatened Syria, Iran and Russia with hellfire and damnation if they dare to try to Make Syria Whole Again  (MSWA – need a vowel in there somehow) by launching the offensive so fully prepared at this date.
“Meanwhile the Sultan Tayyip and his crew at the summit of Turkworld are doing their best to outplay everyone in an effort to effectively annex as much of NW Syria as possible.  To that end Tayyip has warned the Syrians against trying to re-capture these lands of the Fertile Crescent, hoping perhaps to see Turkish taught there as the mandatory medium of communication in the manner of German in Alsace-Lorraine from 1871-1918.  Turkey is reinforcing its “Observation Posts” all around the perimeter of Idlib Province whilst the White Helmets Film Troupe (WHFT) have a number of possible new Oscar winner “documentaries” in production at their FUKUS sponsored jisr al-shughur facility.
“My Fearless Forecast – In the end, the Russians and Syrians will say to hell with this and launch the offensive. pl”

Will Mueller Opt For ’Non-existent’ Intelligence?

By Ray McGovern

The phone was fully charged, and yet … Opps! During a radio interview on Sept. 6, Ray’s cellphone went mysteriously dead after ten minutes, precisely at minute 16:44, a second after he questioned whether Robert Mueller deserves the sainthood bestowed on him in Establishment media. The radio studio could find no technical reason to account for why the line dropped abruptly immediately after Ray words that Mueller’s “reputation for honesty does not withstand close scrutiny.”
https://sputniknews.com/radio_the_critical_hour/201809071067821350-op-ed-reveals-trump-resistance/
(Ray’s interview segment runs from minute 6:05 to its premature end at 16:44.)

 
Interviewer Wilmer Leon adroitly chooses not to “reason why” the abrupt cutoff, and transitions smoothly — well, sort of smoothly — to the next segment.
 
“Reason Why?” The following might provide a hint.  Before the line dropped, Ray had been speculating that — rather than face the embarrassment of coming up with zero evidence of Trump-Russia collusion — Mueller might accept and promote the kind of “non-existent” evidence touted by miscreants like John Brennan and James Clapper to justify attacking Iraq.
 
For those of you who do not know, Mueller himself was an important part of all that.  As FBI director at the time, he dutifully parroted that faux-intelligence, and the war-profiteering Establishment gladly drank the Kool Aid.
 
Mueller had been warned.  Three weeks after Powell lied about operational ties between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda, and three weeks before the attack on Iraq, then-FBI Special Agent and Minneapolis Division Counsel Coleen Rowley sent a Memorandum to Mueller, later published in the NY Times.https://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/05/politics/full-text-of-fbi-agents-letter-to-director-mueller.html
 
Rowley asked directly:

“What is the FBI’s evidence with respect to a connection between al-Qaeda and Iraq? Polls show that Americans are completely confused about who was responsible for the suicidal attacks on 9-11 with many blaming Iraq. And it is clear that this impression has been fostered by many in the Administration. … If the FBI does have independent data verifying such a connection, it would seem such information should be shared, at least internally within the FBI.”

 

Mueller did not reply.  Did he know the evidence was “non-existent?”  Hey, it was about starting a war of aggression and Muller was head of the FBI.  Did he not ask to see the intelligence?
 
We are talking out-and-out fraud: not only “intelligence” that was “mis-overestimated,” so to speak, but also some that was, well, poof! — created into existence, like the evidence used by Colin Powell at the UN on Feb. 5, 2003 to claim the existence of a “sinister nexus” between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.

Ray is hardly the the only one to label some of the “evidence” used to “justify” war on Iraq as “non-existent.”  In fact, “non-existent” is one of the adjectives the Senate Intelligence Committee chair used on June 5, 2008, when he announced the bipartisan findiings of the committee’s five-year investigation into pre-Iraq-war intelligence:

“In making the case for war, the Administration repeatedly presented intelligence as fact when in reality it was unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent.  As a result, the American people were led to believe that the threat from Iraq was much greater than actually existed.”

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/press/senate-intelligence-committee-unveils-final-phase-ii-reports-prewar-iraq-intelligence

The Senate’s findings were published ten years ago and got little play in corporate media.  Those with little or no memory of the Senate investigation may wish to click on the link and skim through its main conclusions, as briefly stated in the press release.

 
Perhaps most important, no one was held accountable for the pre-Iraq-war fraud
 
So what’s to lose?

After what the UN has twice called Julian Assange’s “arbitrary detention” became solitary confinement with Julian rendered incommunicado on March 28, “Unity4J” was born — described initially as a “Non-Violent Digital Army for Julian.” Since then Online Solidarity Vigils have been held almost monthly.  Here are links to the full interview cuts from the latest vigil.  There were more than 70,000 live viewers.

Highlighted are a few that may be of particular interest — see 13, 14, AND 19, for example.  Also, see note attached to Craig Murray’s, who has become the Robert Parry of the UK — in addition to his other incredible creds, so to speak.
1. Intro: Suzie Dawson interviewing Joe Lauria https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2wo0LvD8EU
2. Joe Lauria interviewing Margaret Kimberley https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kY4BTscaUWg
3. Margaret Kimberley interviewing Nat Parry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06o3TczlNog
4. Nat Parry interviewing Daniel McAdams https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hme_2jW2Js
** 5. Daniel McAdams interviewing Ray McGovern https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AihXtsbBGJ4
** 6. Ray McGovern interviewing Graham Elwood https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIgZnIEVIx4
7. Graham Elwood interviewing Alastair Thompson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idWhldJtV4k
8. Alastair Thompson interviewing Catherine Austin Fitts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Tz-Qi1nwGU
9. Catherine Austin Fitts interviewing Mehdi Taileb https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_Qf0xU7i9Y
10. Mehdi Taileb interviewing Mark Sleboda https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ8r6CIr014
11. Mark Sleboda interviewing Cathy Vogan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVh0g14fiu0
12. Cathy Vogan interviewing Lee Stranahan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmK7RGO-FE0
** 13. Lee Stranahan interviewing Craig Murray https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9yRakHQLJs
For updates, see Craig Murray’s blog — a recent posting addressing the latest drivel from Establishment London, for example, begins with:
“Russia has developed an astonishing new technology enabling its secret agents to occupy precisely the same space at precisely the same time….”
** 14. Suzie Dawson interviewing Bill Binney https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cREvDEVy_ak
15. Suzie Dawson interviewing Niko House https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRUwC7OxNrI
16. Joe Lauria interviewing George Szamuely https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJ0SMph0B-4
17. George Szamuely interviewing Don DeBar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsqRgBNbPoM
18. Don DeBar interviewing Ann Garrison https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyjVGryc69U
** 19. Joe Lauria interviewing Daniel Ellsberg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOMkGIlns6o

Bill Binney Explains How We Know “Guccifer 2.0” Is a Fraud

He displays forensic data behind the conclusion that the DNC was not hacked by Russia.  Bill refers to reporting that emails between former DNC worker Seth Rich and WikiLeaks were found on Rich’s computer. Expect Bill, a former Technical Director of NSA, to be labeled, again, a “conspiracy theorist.”  There may well be a conspiracy; but it ain’t Bill.
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/forensic-data-proves-dnc-was-not-hacked-by-russia/
Interview was on July 17 (17 minutes)

We are told Seth Rich’s computer is in good hands — the FBI. Right!  One wag has suggested that Comey gave the computer to Crowdstrike to work on.

 
Where is Rich’s computer; and why all the secrecy … and why the exceedingly deliberate speed?