The CIA is 70 years old…

On August 30, The Heat, China’s English-language TV’s premier news panel program, hosted an international panel, including Ray, to review and comment on those 70 years.

Part 1: 11 minutes

 

Part 2: 14 minutes

 

Intelligence Analysts Say Russia Didn’t Hack U.S. Election; It Was an Inside Job

Watch Lee Camp use humor and some precious video clips to drive home the points that VIPS has been making.

August 26, 2017 (16 minutes)

 

Last year Wikileaks showed Clinton’s campaign to be laughably corrupt. Our media promptly began equating Wikileaks with “Russian hackers,” instead of analyzing the proven corruption of the DNC and its implications. VIPS, founded in 2003 to question the WMD narrative from which our consent was manufactured to attack Iraq, has re-emerged to question the Russian hacking narrative that politicians and media pundits have hammered into our brains since the election. Hard science from these forensic investigators and intelligence analysts now demonstrates the Podesta emails came from a leak, not a hack.

Corporate media, unsurprisingly, won’t touch this story, as it would indict them to a devastating degree. The most nefarious things about endless media repetition of this Russian hacking narrative are that it’s been sold to us as an “attack” and an “an act of war,” and that Democratic politicians don’t have to reflect on the neo liberal economic policies that caused so many to vote for Trump in the (false) hope that he represented a change. In sum, the military industrial complex wins, and the Democratic establishment successfully avoids all scrutiny of neglecting the people it claims to represent.

A smart Irishman, Mark F. McCarty has taken the time to put “Russia-gate” in perspective.

https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/whats-left-of-russiagate-are-we-down-to-the-1-000-paid-trolls-222bb4c3b3ff

July 19, 2017

 

WARNING: Consumers of the Kool-Aid handed out over the past year will need to undergo the equivalent of a full stem-cell replacement, in order to read though McCarty’s wrap-up without getting very disturbed.  Totally understandable.  You may not wish to read it.  But if you do try, you may want to avoid, in particular, the embedded links – like the two-minute video of James Comey.  For those with more inquisitiveness than conditioning, think about sharing McCarty’s wrap-up with the researchers who have led Amy Goodman – and even Bill Moyers – down the garden path on “Russian hacking.”